Thursday, May 26, 2022
cnntoday
  • World
    • Africa
    • Europe
    • Middle East
    • China
  • United States
  • India
  • Australia
  • UK
  • Business
  • History & Art
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Video Reels
  • Shorts
No Result
View All Result
  • World
    • Africa
    • Europe
    • Middle East
    • China
  • United States
  • India
  • Australia
  • UK
  • Business
  • History & Art
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Video Reels
  • Shorts
No Result
View All Result
News 100
No Result
View All Result
Home History

Ike Would Like the New Private Space Race

August 2, 2021
in History
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Ike Would Like the New Private Space Race
0
SHARES
34
VIEWS


Yanek Mieczkowski is a presidential historian and the author of Eisenhower’s Sputnik Moment:  The Race for Space and World Prestige, Gerald Ford and the Challenges of the 1970s, and The Routledge Historical Atlas of Presidential Elections. 

President Dwight Eisenhower laughs with Wernher von Braun at the dedication of the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, September 8, 1960.

 

 

 

Dwight D. Eisenhower, the five-star general and 34th president who was honored in 2020 with a new memorial in Washington, would watch keenly the latest Space Race, which capitalizes on private enterprise’s ingenuity and financial heft.  Within just ten days, billionaires Richard Branson of Britain and Jeff Bezos of the U.S. launched themselves beyond the earth’s atmosphere, touching the fringes of outer space.  Their flirtations with space attracted worldwide attention and generated speculation that more commercial companies—including Elon Musk’s SpaceX—will hurl humans to the heavens. 

 

In 1957, the original Space Race started when the Soviet Union launched the world’s first satellite, Sputnik.  Critics charged that President Eisenhower was apathetic, but he resisted calls to view space exploration as a race and responded cautiously, building America’s efforts by steady increments.  The strategy seemed to work.  By the time Ike left office, the U.S. had launched 31 satellites, while Russia had just nine.  But in the Cold War climate, space became politicized, and members of Congress and the media clamored for massive spending on space projects. 

 

Eisenhower wanted to avoid that, and his reasons resonate today.  He feared mushrooming government growth, and while the Cold War Space Race showcased capitalism’s superiority over Communism, the irony was that government—rather than the private sector—directed and underwrote U.S. space efforts.  In his Farewell Address, Eisenhower coined the term “military-industrial complex” to warn about the burly ligament binding government and the armaments industry, warping the economy, but the potential for a “space-industrial complex,” with large public contracts doled out to aerospace concerns, was just as real.

 

Government spending brought other perils.  One was inflation.  While campaigning for president, Eisenhower showed inflation’s dangers by sawing off sections of a board, telling crowds that inflation could similarly cut down the dollar’s value.  Today, inflation again threatens; in June 2021, the Consumer Price Index rose 5.4 percent, the largest spike in thirteen years.  One key to taming inflation is restraining government spending, and Eisenhower did that throughout his presidency.

 

Eisenhower also wanted to check government spending to minimize the federal debt.  Repeatedly, he issued alerts about the ticking debt bomb that would explode on future generations of Americans.  The massive federal debt the U.S. was accumulating, he warned, “is going to be a hundred times worse for our children and our grandchildren, unless we stop it.” 

Now is the era of Eisenhower’s grandchildren, and his words seem prophetic.  In the 1950s, the federal budget was only $80 billion, with deficits just over $1 billion—and Eisenhower even presided over three budget surpluses.  By contrast, for fiscal year 2020, the federal budget was $4.8 trillion, and the deficit was $3.1 trillion.  Eisenhower would be horrified.  If he were president, every government agency’s budget would be on the chopping block, including that of NASA, which he helped to create and which became the cutting-edge outfit to probe the final frontier.

 

So Ike would be pleased at the accomplishments of Bezos and Branson, which avoid increased government spending and showcase the private sector’s initiative.  Americans like Bezos and Musk demonstrate the country’s know-how, resources, and willpower to send satellites and humans skyward.  Sending humans into space especially draws the media spotlight and bolsters America’s world prestige.

 

That was a vital aspect of the Cold War Space Race.  It was a “prestige race,” helping to determine which superpower—the U.S. or the U.S.S.R.—would generate the greatest global standing and followers, a contest spilling into other venues, including the Olympics.  Initially, Eisenhower denied that space exploits enhanced world prestige.  He instead cited more mundane metrics, like industrial and agricultural productivity and a robust consumer goods market.  He was right, but had he lived to see the Apollo landings, he might have conceded that spectacular human space adventures boost a nation’s image by inspiring people and stoking admiration worldwide. 

 

The world saw that this July.  After Bezos’s flight, The Australian news agency trumpeted, “Space Tourism Takes Off,” calling it “a key moment” for a new industry.  Such success burnishes the reputation of the U.S., a nation Eisenhower loved so much that he devoted his career to serving it, once telling his wife Mamie, “My country comes first and always will.  You come second.”  He would have reveled in the media plaudits that commercial space achievements generate, reflecting the American virtues and ingenuity he believed in so much. 

 

Eisenhower would flash his famous grin at this new Space Race.  He would like it indeed. 



Source link

ShareTweetShareSendSend

Related Posts

Musketeers in the English Civil Wars
History

Musketeers in the English Civil Wars

January 17, 2022
19
New York State's Lessons on Preventing a Crisis of Judicial Legitimacy
History

New York State’s Lessons on Preventing a Crisis of Judicial Legitimacy

January 17, 2022
21
Can a New Labor Movement Grow and Win with Direct Action Instead of Collective Bargaining?
History

Can a New Labor Movement Grow and Win with Direct Action Instead of Collective Bargaining?

January 16, 2022
49

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

News 100

© 2021 News100

https://securetpnews.info/slot-gacor/ https://gratisbreipatroon.nl/situs-slot-gacor-hari-ini/ https://news100.org/situs-judi-slot-terbaik-dan-terpercaya-no-1/ slot online Slot Gacor Slot Terbaru Situs Slot Gacor Slot Gacor Gampang Menang

Navigate Site

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Other Links

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • World
    • Africa
    • Europe
    • Middle East
    • China
  • United States
  • India
  • Australia
  • UK
  • Business
  • History & Art
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Video Reels
  • Shorts

© 2021 News100

https://securetpnews.info/slot-gacor/ https://gratisbreipatroon.nl/situs-slot-gacor-hari-ini/ https://news100.org/situs-judi-slot-terbaik-dan-terpercaya-no-1/ slot online Slot Gacor Slot Terbaru Situs Slot Gacor Slot Gacor Gampang Menang

Welcome Back!

OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Slot88

Slot Gacor

Situs Slot Gacor

Slot Gacor

Slot Online

Daftar Slot88

Slot88

Slot Gacor

Slot Gacor

Slot88 Online

Slot Gacor Pragmatic

Slot Online Terbaik dan Terpercaya

Slot Gacor

Slot Online Terbaik dan Terpercaya