Friday, February 3, 2023
  • Home
  • Politics
  • News
  • Business
  • Culture
  • National
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
News 100
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorized

Lawyers to argue gas project in WA will affect Great Barrier Reef in Qld

news100 by news100
June 21, 2022
in Uncategorized
0 0
0
Lawyers to argue gas project in WA will affect Great Barrier Reef in Qld
0
SHARES
21
VIEWS


It is 3,000 kilometres from the Great Barrier Reef, but according to a Federal Court challenge mounted by conservationists, a gas project in Western Australia could have disastrous impacts on Queensland’s embattled World Heritage site.

Key points:

  • Woodside Energy’s Scarborough gas project has cleared major state and Commonwealth regulatory hurdles
  • The Australian Conservation Foundation says it also needs approval from the Environment Minister
  • Woodside says it will “vigorously defend” its position against the court challenge

The Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) has applied for an injunction against Woodside’s Scarborough gas project, asking that it be halted until new federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek has assessed whether the operation will damage the Great Barrier Reef by exacerbating climate change.

ACF boss Kelly O’Shanassy said the west coast project posed a major risk to Australia’s precious World Heritage site.

Related posts

Anyone missing a huge silver ingot? Police search for owner after NSW beach discovery

Anyone missing a huge silver ingot? Police search for owner after NSW beach discovery

January 6, 2023

Tesla Sales in China Slump as Competition Intensifies

January 6, 2023

“People in Australia would be shocked to know that the Scarborough gas mine that is proposed has never been approved under Australia’s environmental law or assessed for the impact that [it] will have on places like the Great Barrier Reef,” Ms O’Shanassy said.

“It’s a really, really big carbon bomb.”

“It’s like turning on 15 coal-fired power stations across Australia.”

Woodside said gas produced by the project would generate enough electricity to power 10 times the number of homes in Perth, and it would do that with emissions of about half of what would be generated by coal.

In a statement, Woodside CEO Meg O’Neill said:

“The Scarborough Project has been the subject of rigorous environmental assessments by a range of regulators.

“The project will deliver significant local and national benefits in the form of employment, tax revenue and reliable gas supply in the energy transition for decades to come.

“Woodside will vigorously defend its position in these proceedings.”

Woodside’s Scarborough gas project includes expanding the current Pluto facility on the Burrup Peninsula.(Supplied: Woodside)

According to the documents filed to the court, predicted emissions from the project would cause global temperatures to rise by nearly 0.0004 degrees Celsius, “which will result in the deaths of millions of corals during each future mass bleaching event”.

ACF also argued that additional warming presented “a real risk” that could in turn trigger a spiral of further, runaway warming, which would all but destroy the Great Barrier Reef.

Any increased warming would result in additional death of coral on the Great Barrier Reef, Selina Ward, a coral reef scientist at the University of Queensland, said. 

“Already at this stage, we are losing vast numbers of corals in bleaching events that are becoming more frequent,” Dr Ward said.

Ove Hoegh-Guldberg from the University of Queensland agreed.

“We’re at a point now where every bit of carbon going into the atmosphere has a price and that price is growing by the day,” Professor Hoegh-Guldberg said.

A close-up of bleached coral.
Coral on the Great Barrier Reef in 2020, after a significant bleaching event.(Supplied: ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies)

This year, the Great Barrier Reef experienced its sixth mass-bleaching event — a phenomenon driven by global warming, which was never observed prior to 1998.

Scientific arguments similar to those used by ACF were presented to the Federal Court by a group of young people trying to establish a duty of care on the environment minister to protect them from climate change. 

At the time, then-environment minister Sussan Ley accepted the scientific arguments, instead disputing the legal implications of them — an argument she won on appeal.

A spokeswoman for Ms Plibersek said she was unable to comment on the legal challenge to Woodside’s Scarborough gas project because the case was before court.

But new Resources Minister Madeleine King has backed the project, and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said the government will support fossil fuel projects that “stack up environmentally and then commercially”.

Woodside project not approved by minister

Woodside plans to open up the new Scarborough gas field, lay about 430km of gas pipes on the sea floor, and significantly expand existing liquefaction facilities, known as “Pluto”, near Karratha in Western Australia.

The project has received key environmental approvals from state and federal governments, and last year Woodside announced a final investment decision had been made to progress the project.

The federal environmental assessment was conducted by the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA), rather than the environment minister, under devolved powers given to the agency.

All offshore projects would normally undergo assessment by NOPSEMA.

However, projects likely to have a significant impact on the Great Barrier Reef cannot be assessed solely by NOPSEMA, and are required to undergo a full assessment by the environment minister.

A photograph taken underwater of a reef and several large turtles are swimming around.
The federal Environment Minister must approve any project that might impact on the Great Barrier Reef.(ABC My Photo contributor @aleksmutated)

As a result, the Environmental Defenders Office, on behalf of ACF, argued that if the project proceeded, it would do so without the required approvals.

Emissions ‘higher’ than claimed

According to Woodside, the project will create up to 3,200 jobs during construction and “nearly” 600 ongoing jobs.

But Bill Hare, a scientist from consultancy Climate Analytics, said emissions figures claimed by the company ignored emissions from the existing LNG facilities at the site.

He said the emissions would actually be about 40 per cent higher — nearly 1.4 billion tonnes.

“Its lifetime emissions would be equivalent to about three times Australia’s present national emissions,” he said.

Most of those emissions would occur when the gas was burned — much of which would occur overseas.

But according to Mr Hare, the project would contribute 41 million tonnes to Australia’s domestic emissions by 2030.

He said that was about 7 per cent of our 2005 emissions — the baseline Australia has now committed to cut emissions to 43 per cent below.

Woodside has said its estimate of 878 million tonnes of emissions is a figure that has been accepted by Australian regulators.





Source link

Tags: ACFAustralian Conservation Foundationclimate changecourt challengeGreat Barrier ReefminingWoodside

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News 100

We bring you the best Premium WordPress Themes that perfect for news, magazine, personal blog, etc.

Follow us on social media:

Recent News

  • Commuters suffer fourth day of chaos as RMT launches new 48-hour strike -LIVE
  • North Korean students are expelled and forced to work in a coal mine
  • FA Cup third round, transfer window news and more: weekend countdown – live

Category

  • Africa
  • Australia
  • Business
  • China
  • Culture
  • Europe
  • History
  • History & Art
  • India
  • Lifestyle
  • Middle East
  • National
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politcs
  • Science
  • Shorts
  • Sports
  • Travel
  • UK
  • Uncategorized
  • United States
  • World

Recent News

Commuters suffer fourth day of chaos as RMT launches new 48-hour strike -LIVE

Commuters suffer fourth day of chaos as RMT launches new 48-hour strike -LIVE

January 6, 2023
North Korean students have been expelled from university and forced to work in a coal mine because they sounded as if they had been watching too much foreign TV, which is banned by dictator Kim Jong-un (pictured in a photo released Jan. 1) in the authoritarian country

North Korean students are expelled and forced to work in a coal mine

January 6, 2023
  • Home 2
  • Science
  • UK
  • Australia
  • Sports
  • World
  • United States
  • India
  • History & Art
  • Uncategorized
  • Europe

© 2023 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • News
  • Business
  • Culture
  • National
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel
  • Opinion

© 2023 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

Welcome Back!

OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Slot88

Slot Gacor

Situs Slot Gacor

Slot Gacor

Slot Online

Daftar Slot88

Slot88

Slot Gacor

Slot Gacor

Slot88 Online

Slot Gacor Pragmatic

Slot Online Terbaik dan Terpercaya

Slot Gacor

Slot Online Terbaik dan Terpercaya